
Inc's 6 top ways that Businesses can use iPads.
The evolving world of Passbook, mobile payments, loyalty, and gift cards


"Medical-sector companies are passing out thousands of iPad tablet computers to salespeople to spruce up their pitch to doctors, and at the same time giving Apple Inc. a crucial foot in the door to business customers.
Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Inc. and Boston Scientific Corp. are among the drug and medical-device firms making the move, while others say they are testing out the devices."

In the next few months, Jeff Letasse, vice president of IT for Conceptus, will hand out more than 220 iPads to every salesperson in the company. He plans to wean them off of their trusty laptops and PDAs, with the hope of never having to buy another laptop for a salesperson again.
The dam holding back consumer devices in the enterprise "has broken wide open," Letasse says.



The Apple iPad and its ecosystem are likely to disrupt existing technology use profiles and business models, and CEOs should ensure that its potential is being seriously evaluated inside their organizations, according to a new report from Gartner Inc.

"How big is this ERP/touchscreen tablet opportunity? Best guess?"OK...according to the statistics available:
So, if we choose to use these numbers -- admittedly guesswork -- then the market opportunity is $50 Billion of legacy fixes, or $15 Billion/year of annual sales.
Of course total size is not the limiting factor in enterprise sales. The size is huge. It's an elephant.
The question is, how fast can we get this elephant to adopt a good new idea, even when that good idea is really easy to prove?
Elephantine rules are slow rules. The ERP market is difficult to change. But again, it's huge, so that is the tradeoff.
The strategy therefore is to pick the sector of that elephantine market that will be easiest to change, and focus our efforts there. What's the sharp stick we can poke with?

In which parts of the enterprise does the iPad offer the best productivity gains? We set out to find the answer to that question, and the answer is: 20%, 40%, and 34%.
We chose a set of five common data entry screens from a corporate ERP suite – Financials, MRP, CRM, and Human Resources – from vendors such as SAP, Oracle, Lawson, and Salesforce.com. These screens were chosen as a cross-section representing (as best as possible) the thousands upon thousands of legacy database applications used in organizations across the world.
We built “iPad optimized” versions of those screens, which exactly duplicated the data entry functions in the standard Windows/keyboard versions. To build the iPad version we used the new iPad-enterprise prototyping tool just released by our partner firm iOptimal.
We chose these five functions carefully, to represent what we call the “40/20 rule." 40% of corporate users – generally managers, supervisors, and engineers – use only 20% of the ERP functions. By a happy coincidence, those 40% of users – our target audience – are also the ones that most likely to use a tablet, since they are generally people who “move around the office a lot” and have difficulties using laptops and workstations. Also by happy coincidence, the 20% of functions needed by these people are functions which don’t require large amounts of keyboard use, thus are well-suited for mobile tablets.
Converting that 20% subset of of ERP functions to the iPad should create significant time savings and a lot of happy users (and happy IT managers as well, since happy users become enthusiastic supporters for IT departments).
The Results
For our five representative tests, we had people perform the correct functions as fast as possible. We timed them by watching keystrokes and time motion study (using a stopwatch). On average these functions were 34% faster to perform on the iPad, for identical data entered, compared to the laptop or workstation.
Why Faster?
Quite simply, the screens typically used by supervisors and engineer lend themselves well to touchscreen interface. Using iPad user interface standards concepts, we were able to greatly reduce clutter on the screens, use finger gestures to quickly select options (more quiickly and intuitively than the mouse), eliminate almost all keystroke entry, and use location-based optimization to auto-fill and rearrange some fields.
The net result was, faster use.
Easier To Use
In addition, the screens were dramatically more enjoyable to use. Old style ERP is often quite crowded and complex to work with, with multiple layers of menu and complex coding structures; we took the opportunity to clean it up.
Caveats
Added note (9/14): People say we should do this test again, with a bigger sample set and with more "disinterested observers." Maybe even a media extravaganza! Great idea.
This is a illuminating quote. Executives didn't want to use laptops because they would look "disengaged." So in theory laptops give people all the facts at hand, but in reality, human nature what it is, the design and form factor of laptops can make some people uncomfortable.Now decisions at meetings are made quickly thanks to the iPad, he says. In the past, no one fired up laptops at meetings in a conference room because it made the executive look disengaged. When a topic came up that required facts to make a decision, such as the difference in cost for an allocated requisition and an unallocated one, the vice president of HR would have to research it later. Thus, the topic would be tabled for the next meeting.
Today, the vice president of HR can look up the pay grades on the iPad, find the difference, and then ask the president if there's room in the operating budget. The president can look it up on the iPad and respond appropriately. "You can't get closure if you don't have the facts," Rennie says. "With the iPad, it's a very different conversation because everyone is armed with the facts at their fingertips."
...the study looks at five distinct attributes of data—quality, usability, intelligence, remote accessibility and sales mobility—and examines how a 10 percent improvement in any one or two of these attributes affects the metrics commonly reported for assessing the financial performance of businessesWhy is this relevant to iPad in the enterprise? Because the use of touchscreen tablets can be used to significantly improve access to enteprise data and user productivity. We can measure productivity increases by mobile devices and plug them into this 10%-2 Billion conversion, to give us a total dollar value for iPad usage.
In a recent iPad/iPhone Meetup group meeting there was a wide-ranging talk about the “best opportunities for iPads in enterprise software” (a topic I keep bringing up, which doesn’t seem to be irritating people yet).
CRM, collaboration, and Enterprise 2.0 were the crowd favorites. Gartner has their famous “Magic Quadrant” analysis, so without further ado, here is our Magic Trident.
Why are these tools a winning combination?
Why IPad any more than laptop?
Since E 2.0 and CRM have been around for years, and the iPad is a newcomer, we need to explain the iPad’s equal footing. I imagine people saying “Why are mobile tablets a crucial part of this picture? Sales reps already carry laptops and already have access to CRM and E 2.0 information. The tablet plays no pivotal role.”
I think the iPad does play a pivotal role.
The touchscreen isn’t just easier and lighter-weight…it is a fundamental improvement in sales customer communication. This point is subtle and hard to explain, but so many sales reps are raving about this quality. Something about the form factor of an iPad makes it so much more useful compared to a laptop.
Laptops are akward. Any awkwardness in the sales call is poison, something to be avoided. On the other hand, iPads are lovely to handle and use, and this quality also impacts the sales rep’s attitude. iPads can be handed to the customer, and can easily be passed around a group. This can create the all-important first steps towards customer commitment.
As one sales rep said: “there is something powerful about handing an iPad to your customer and letting them drive the presentation with their own hands. It perks up the whole sales call. Maybe it’s some kind of psychology trick. I don’t know but I am using it ”
(Edit 10/26/2010): For a great discussion of this see "Enterprise 2.0 and CRM, Two Great Tastes That Taste Great Together" and another announcement from the Enterprise 2.0 conference.

Translation: Enterprise users get bad interfaces because enterprises aren't willing to spend the time and money to fix those interfaces.
The average enterprise will continue to make ineffective use of any and all available UI technologies. The root problem is not lack of powerful UI technology. Instead, the root causes for a suboptimal user experience consist of lack of appropriate process and governance, and lack of a genuine commitment to a quality user experience....
Remember again that enterprise applications salres are $60 Billion/year, for a cumulative total of half a Trillion dollars over 20 years, so that's a big legacy market to convert.


Forrester Research survey data shows that more than two-thirds of companies are still investing in their ERP systems--despite the recession, upgrade costs and maintenance fee complaints.
Since the dawn of automated, electronic capture of corporate financial, operations, supply chain, HR and sales information data—what's become, more or less, ERP—companies have cumulatively spent billions, if not trillions, on managing and trying to extract value from their vast data repositories.
ERP isn't much different today than the technology early adopters installed 15 years ago. But new technologies make traditional ERP seem dated. "The concept of ERP is not dead, but the technology under it is," says Bill Brydges, managing director of the ERP practice group at the consultancy MorganFranklin.
Cloud computing, mobile applications, social knowledge sharing and predictive analytics present trouble spots for CIOs trying to move ERP systems into the future.
Meanwhile, Christensen advises, CIOs need to keep making noise about bringing in upstart vendors that offer the technology the big guys don't. CIOs Galonis at Choice Hotels and Harten at Haworth are doing just that as they pressure their current vendors to hurry up with new capabilities.A New Source of ERP Value
Further out, Stanec, for one, dreams of seeing ERP vendors develop packages that help companies generate revenue. "Then," he says, "we'd have something interesting to negotiate."
CIOs want better integration of analytics for data insight.The same could be said for mobile.



"Our team has been looking at iPhone usage for several years, and iPad usage for the past couple months, in real corporate environments. We are finding dramatic improvements in speed and efficiency for iPad compared to identical Windows-based data entry screens for a certain percentage of enterprise corporate users...about 50% on average. For these people, not being tied to a desktop or laptop is crucial in the performance of their duties, and thus the iPad represents a significant time savings and relieves long-standing pain points."This elevator pitch is subject to change at any time, depending on the cycle of the moon and the arrangement of the tea leaves.
This quote so perfectly explains why the iPad is so much more efficient than a laptop for a lot of users:"Have you ever watched a teacher rotate around the room to observe student work with a netbook or laptop? It is cumbersome and artificial. The focus is always in the end on the hardware and not the student work. There is a stop point at which they need to put the machine down and type in it."Now replace the phrase "teacher rotate around the room" with the following:

"Wondering why your company's staffers are using only a fraction of the software features and functionality that your bounteous enterprise software offers?It's easy to point out these problems, but as any IT manager can attest, it's very difficult to get agreement between groups of people as to how to "fix" the problem.
Harold Hambrose can give you an answer. In fact, Hambrose, founder of Electronic Ink, a consultancy specializing in designing and developing business systems, wrote a book about what he claims is the $60 billion that U.S. businesses will waste this fiscal year on poorly designed software."
"We're not going to invest effort in the iPad until we see it's a clear winner...and not going to be superseded by an equivalent tablet from Microsoft"While I understand the caution, in this case, it's misplaced.
Donna Trivison, Director of IT for Ursuline College, said, “Yes, there is a business case which can be made for iPad or other convenient, easy to use tablet computers. The iPod Touch /iPad is instant on, instant off, and instant load. This aspect alone makes a compelling business case. Time is money. Though I’m not sure if that would be considered a function of tablet per se. It is more a function of iPhone operating system and multi-touch user interface, push one button, touch one icon. App loads and performs flawlessly. All apps (a.k.a., software) have a standardized look and feel… Elegant, functional, revolutionary.”"Time is money." Also, time is an obstacle for millions of users, who don't have the time to constantly walk back to their desks to enter information into their enterprise software. The iPhone has been successfully removing that obstacle for many users, and the iPad is now doubling down on the concept.


Finally it should be repeated that the lack of a keyboard on a tablet computer is not a flaw. Keyboards are essentially useless on the tablet form factor. This is why Apple computer chose, years ago, to bet on a touchscreen interface, and why most of the older, industrial tablets (used in healthcare, shipping, etc) are pen-based, and also why future tablet computers, we predict, will de-emphasize keyboard use, even if they include a physical keyboard to satisfy user demand.


“Enterprise software is entirely bereft of soul”Most enterprise software developers know this, and it can be mental torture to know that you work in an industry that seems so...well...soulless, so un-sexy, yet with so much un-realized potential.

With the iPad, teachers can now easily walk around and record the information on an ongoing basis. Have you ever watched a teacher rotate around the room to observe student work with a netbook or laptop? It is cumbersome and artificial. The focus is always in the end on the hardware and not the student work. There is a stop point at which they need to put the machine down and type in it. With the weight, design, and simple kinaesthetic input, teachers literally can input 3-4 taps and have recorded all of the student’s information while maintaining focus and providing verbal feedback to the child.

"The survey, based on the ERP experience of 214 business executives across a wide variety of midsize and larger industries, found that today's ERP systems "are not providing businesses with the architectural agility necessary to support businesses adequately in today's high-change, global environment."How can the iPad and iPhone help fix this ERP industry problem? That's the question that our group has been studying and will discuss more in future posts.
That's not too shocking. But what is notable about the results (and what makes them different than your garden-variety ERP study that shows sky-high TCO, or application performance problems, or unfavorable implementation odds), is that this survey actually quantifies ERP system-related failings directly to business disruption—expensive, unpleasant and career-killing business disruption.
"Survey respondents said that the inability to easily modify their ERP system deployments is disrupting their businesses by delaying product launches, slowing decision making and delaying acquisitions and other activities that ultimately cost them between $10 million and $500 million in lost opportunities," according to the survey report. (That's a substantial gulf in "lost opportunities," but we'll chalk that up to the size differences in companies surveyed.)
That related impact is costly: 21 percent of respondents reported declines in stock price; 14 percent suffered revenue losses tied to delayed product launches; and 17 percent encountered declines in customer satisfaction.
A couple of verbatim responses from respondents should make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up: "Capital expenditure priorities are shifted into IT from other high-payback projects" just to perform necessary ERP changes, noted one respondent. Said another: "Change to ERP paralyzes the entire organization in moving forward in other areas that can bring more value."